ILA breaks off East Coast port contract talks
ILA breaks off East Coast port contract talks

Union Accuses Port Employers of Pushing Automation in Longshore Contract Negotiations

The International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) has halted contract negotiations with East and Gulf Coast port employers, accusing them of attempting to incorporate automation technology into a new labor agreement, which could jeopardize union jobs.

This week, the ILA and representatives from the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) resumed discussions on a six-year master contract covering 45,000 union workers involved in container handling at numerous ports along the East and Gulf Coasts.

In a now-deleted statement shared on social media, the ILA claimed that during meetings in New Jersey, “USMX introduced language in their proposal for semi-automated equipment to be used at ILA ports, which this union outright rejected.” The ILA interpreted this move as a renewed attempt by USMX to eliminate jobs through automation, prompting them to break off negotiations.

The ILA has firmly stated its opposition to including automation technology in the new coastwise contract. A three-day strike by the union in early October halted container handling at 36 port facilities and threatened the movement of billions of dollars’ worth of goods. The strike concluded when representatives from the Biden administration facilitated an extension of the existing contract through January 15, allowing negotiations to continue.

“The ILA’s determination remains steadfast against sacrificing any union jobs,” the union declared. “We are disheartened that USMX would attempt to undermine our established stance against job-suppressing automation. Once again, employers, who are profiting billions annually, have revealed their intent to replace ILA jobs with robotic systems.”

During the strike’s resolution, both the union and employers agreed on a 62% pay increase over the new contract’s term.

“While we have made headway on several issues, we have not made substantial progress regarding technology-related discussions,” USMX stated in a release. “Unfortunately, the ILA insists on an agreement that would regress our industry by limiting the future use of technology that has already been present in some ports for nearly two decades, hindering our ability to adapt to the nation’s evolving supply chain needs.”

USMX emphasized that it is not seeking technology that would eliminate jobs. They advocate for modernization that enhances worker safety, improves efficiency while protecting and creating jobs, strengthens supply chains, and boosts capacity, benefiting American businesses and workers alike.